|
|
|
NEWS > 09 February 2006 |
Other related articles:
Police union boss suspended af
Victorian Police Association secretary Paul Mullett has been suspended from duty, following two days of testimony before the Office of Police Integrity (OPI) hearing.
Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon says it is up to the Police Association to decide his future in the union.
"This afternoon I have suspended Senior Sergeant Paul Mullett on full pay," she said.
"I have formed a view with a great deal of thought that he has in fact breached the Telecommunications Intercept Act and also the provisions of the OPI Act."
Mr Mullet is accused of breaching ... Read more
|
Article sourced from |
|
Monsters and Critics.com - Gla 09 February 2006
This article appeared in the above title/site. To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
|
Anger as police cleared of tab
The solicitor of a man shot dead when police mistook the table leg he had been carrying for a shotgun has today voiced his anger at the expected decision not to discipline the officers involved.
Harry Stanley was killed seven years ago in Hackney, east London, when Inspector Neil Sharman and PC Kevin Fagan opened fire on him after receiving intelligence that he had a sawn-off shotgun in a carrier bag.
The officers were originally found guilty of unlawful killing at an inquest, but that verdict was quashed by the high court.
An Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) report today is expected to recommend no further action against the two men.
But Daniel Machover, solicitor for the Stanley family, has described this decision as 'deeply disappointing'.
Speaking on the Today programme Mr Machover said he understood the IPCC would follow the recommendations of Surrey police, who conducted their own investigation into the incident.
'Surrey police recommended that the police do not face any disciplinary charges,' he said.
'That will be bitterly disappointing to [Mr Stanley's widow] Irene Stanley, particularly as we understand that the IPCC agrees with us that the accounts of these officers continue to lack credibility. That's a very significant finding in our view, notwithstanding the decision about charges.'
And he said questions now had to be asked about the practice of police officers being allowed to pool their recollections and write up notes together after an incident.
'No other family should have to think immediately after the events there has been a cover-up because suspects in a very serious criminal investigation are allowed to put their notes together after an incident,' he said.
'No other suspect is allowed that privilege, it shouldn't happen with police officers.'
The solicitor agreed this was standard procedure for policing, but he insisted the practice was not appropriate for such a serious incident.
He added: 'Whatever the outcome here I think the police must accept that in this case this system has been discredited and should be put aside.'
Mr Machover said the family had been left with a sense that they had not had justice from the process and now wanted to see 'real changes' as a result of this case.
|
|
EiP Comments: |
|
|
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
|
|