|
|
|
NEWS > 22 March 2006 |
Other related articles:
Meerut police turn ‘moral’ hoo
“Operation Majnu”, purportedly a drive in Meerut against indecency and eve-teasing in public wherein police assaulted young couples in a park on Tuesday in the full glare of TV cameras, has snowballed into a major controversy.
The Meerut police had in a well-planned and co-ordinated operation taken the press, both print as well as electronic, along and cracked down brutally on people lounging in Gandhi park.
The operation was telecast live by some TV news channels. Locals reacted strongly against the incident.
Taking a serious view of the police action, the ... Read more
|
Article sourced from |
|
Tampa Tribune - Tampa,FL,USA 22 March 2006
This article appeared in the above title/site. To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
|
Tampa Police Policy Bans Intra
TAMPA - Kevin Durkin is a divorced Tampa police detective, head of the police union and a private guy when it comes to his personal life.
So he's baffled why he and other officers have to tell Police Chief Stephen Hogue about a one-night stand with a colleague or thinking of asking a co-worker for a date.
"I don't tell my mom who I'm dating, unless things work out," he said Tuesday.
The union Durkin leads may contest a bulletin the police department's legal adviser issued last week, advising all sworn personnel about a city policy banning fraternization between supervisors and subordinates as well as among co-workers.
"We're now 'The Dating Game' police," said Durkin, president of the West Central Florida Police Benevolent Association.
Police department spokeswoman Laura McElroy said the bulletin was meant to remind everyone - especially newly promoted corporals and sergeants - about the three-year-old policy.
Durkin, however, described the bulletin as a "knee-jerk reaction to a couple of officers who have had problems with relationships."
He declined to elaborate. McElroy said the executive staff did not discuss specific officers before asking Assistant City Attorney Kirby Rainsberger to draft the bulletin.
City Policy B24.1 was part of the city's ethics ordinance. In addition to prohibiting supervisors from overseeing people with whom they are intimate, it states co-workers who are involved with each other must disclose their relationship so one can be reassigned to another shift, unit or facility.
It is a fairly standard policy among local law enforcement agencies, with the exception of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office. There, Sheriff Jim Coats has prohibited adultery, exempting people who are legally separated or filing for divorce.
Durkin and McElroy agreed that having supervisors and subordinates work together while romantically involved presents problems. In addition, one co-worker dating another might put himself in harm's way to help his sweetheart - say, charging into a burning building or gunfight - which is a safety concern.
But the language used in the bulletin is "way overblown," Durkin said, making him question the degree to which the department will judge officers' love lives.
"I don't think any of this is appropriate," he said.
For instance, the bulletin says close personal relationships include "casual dating, any sexual relationship and cohabitation."
Any "pending or potential relationship" between a supervisor and a subordinate must be immediately disclosed to the police chief's office by both employees "so that immediate corrective action can be taken," the document states. Any co-workers who have such relationships also must disclose the contact, which can result in their working different shifts or with different squads.
Failing to disclose such a relationship could result in dismissal, the bulletin states.
Employee Relations Manager Sarah Lang said the proposed discipline is standard for not following any city policy. Neither she nor McElroy could recall any officer being dismissed over not revealing such a relationship.
Police and firefighters are the city employees most often reassigned because of their love lives and the judgment calls they must make under stress, Lang said. "I can't recall moving anyone if it wasn't for safety reasons," she said.
McElroy said the department had not learned of the police union's concerns but is open to discussing them.
"We're not trying to police people's dating," she said. "We're trying to make sure people are safe."
|
|
EiP Comments: |
Does your police agency have t |
|
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
|
|