|
|
|
| NEWS > 26 July 2007 |
Other related articles:
Parents of autistic boy who wa
The family of a 12-year-old autistic boy who was shot last year with a police stun gun at a Hawthorne middle school accused police officials on Monday of removing their son from school in handcuffs days after the incident and subjecting him to an interrogation in retaliation for a misconduct complaint the family had filed.
The family's attorneys contacted The Times after reading the Hawthorne Police Department's version of the Sept. 23 incident in the newspaper this week. The department had declined to name the boy.
Despite knowing the youngster was developmentally disab... Read more
|
 Article sourced from
|
|
ABC News - USA
26 July 2007
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
Milwaukee Police Department, W
|
3 Police Officers Convicted in
Three white former police officers were convicted Thursday of beating a biracial man outside a party and violating his civil rights, but a suspended officer was acquitted in the case.
Federal prosecutors said the four were part of a group of off-duty officers who beat Frank Jude Jr. in October 2004 outside a housewarming party for one of the officers.
The jury that included one black man convicted fired officers Jon Bartlett, 35, Daniel Masarik, 27, and Andrew Spengler, 28, of violating Jude's civil rights and conspiring to assault him while acting as officers. Each faces up to 20 years in prison and $500,000 in fines at sentencing, set for Nov. 29.
Suspended officer Ryan Packard, 27, was acquitted of both charges after the jury deliberated 3 1/2 days.
An all-white jury acquitted Bartlett, Masarik and Spengler of most state charges last year. Hundreds marched through downtown in protest.
Six months later, federal prosecutors charged those three and Packard, as well as four others, who have pleaded guilty to similar federal charges.
Jude smiled and put his arm around his attorney as about 20 people cheered outside the courthouse.
"I'm happy, but at the same time a little sad about Ryan Packard," Jude said. "He was there but didn't do nothing to help me or protect me."
Jude went to Spengler's home with Lovell Harris, 34, who is black, and two white women. He testified during the federal trial that a group of men surrounded their truck as they left and dragged him out.
Someone in the group punched him repeatedly and kicked him in the groin, causing him to black out at least once, Jude testified. The beating continued even after on-duty police arrived.
Jude testified that he recognized Spengler's voice as the person who threatened him while a gun was put to his head, but acknowledged he didn't see who it was. He also said he couldn't identify the people who beat him.
Other witnesses said the four officers punched or kicked Jude.
Bartlett's lawyer, Gerald Boyle, said he felt the trial was fair. Masarik's lawyer, Jonathan Smith, said his client was disappointed but no decision has been made on an appeal.
Attorneys for Spengler and Packard would not comment. Packard's family was in the packed courtroom and cried when the verdicts were read. They hugged him outside the courthouse afterward.
Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett said he hoped the verdicts would renew the city's sense of community.
Barrett urged the Legislature to pass a proposal to change state law, which pays fired Milwaukee police officers while they appeal their dismissals. Milwaukee citizens have paid more than $474,000 to the three convicted officers, two of whom will be on the payroll until sentencing, he said.
Police Chief Nannette Hegerty said the verdicts were what the community needed to move on. She said changes she's implemented since the beatings stricter hiring practices, officer background checks and a zero-tolerance misconduct policy are helping restore trust.
The police department disciplined 13 officers after the confrontation, including nine who were fired. Two of the fired officers won back their jobs.
Jude and the others who were with him have sued the officers and the city in federal court.
|
| |
 EiP Comments:
|
|---|
|
| |
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
 |
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
| |
|
