|
|
|
| NEWS > 08 December 2005 |
Other related articles:
Not a black and white issue; O
ENFIELD - It's been more than three years since James Argenta, a local police dispatcher, was fired following an arrest on marijuana possession charges.
The town has waged a lengthy legal battle to uphold Argenta's firing. Those efforts sustained a blow last week after a three-judge panel of the state Appellate Court unanimously ordered Argenta's reinstatement.
The Town Council will meet behind closed doors Monday to discuss the case with its lawyers. It must decide by the end of the month whether to try to appeal the issue to the state Supreme Court.
Ar... Read more
|
 Article sourced from
|
|
CNET News.com - United States
08 December 2005
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
|
Police video scandal spotlight
Today's headliner about the suspension of 20 San Francisco police officers for their alleged roles in making "sexist" and "racists" videos is intriguing on many levels; it's about politics, cops, judgement calls, free speech and--of particular interest to us at CNET News.com--the public nature of the Internet.
S.F. Mayor Gavin Newsom and Police Chief Heather Fong announced the suspensions at a press conference Wednesday before showing clips from the videos they described as mocking minorities and treating women as objects. The films, which feature officers mainly from one of the city's crime-plagued stations, were produced by Officer Andrew Cohen, who posted them on the now defunct site www.insidethesfpd.com.
The videos are parodies of police patrols involving African Americans, Asian Americans and transgender individuals. Newsom said the conduct of those involved with the videos "is shameful. It is offensive. it is sexist, it is homophobic, it is racist, and we're going to make sure it ends."
However, in an interview on KRON with columnist Phil Matier, Cohen's lawyer, Daniel Horowitz, called the videos a form of artistic communication that make a point about community perception and what's wrong with the department. He also argued that his client didn't "release" the videos. He merely put them on a Web site that's viewed by police officers and not on a search engine. "He was not releasing it to the general public at this time," Horowitz said.
Rather, it was Newsom and Fong who made "a real bonehead move" by releasing the videos to the public at a press conference and thus making it a national story, Horowitz said.
Hmmm. That leaves us wondering how putting something on the Web is different than releasing it to the public. Guess Cohen didn't learn any lessons from a similar scandal in which a racy training tape for the San Francisco 49ers was circulated online.
Posted by Michelle Meyers
|
| |
 EiP Comments:
|
|---|
|
| |
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
 |
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
| |
|
