I have to ask, in the words of Chris Braeden, retired, Edmonton Police Service, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, "What is the object of the exercise?" That is, what is the objective we are aiming to attain?
If the purpose of a code of ethics is only to increase the officer's awareness of ethical concepts and considerations, but with no teeth for enforcement, that is one thing; however, if the aim is to lay down a set of standards of conduct, from which there is an expectation of adherence, then it follows that there must be a vehicle for enforcement of those standards.
I think that first, we need to agree on the purpose of a code of ethics before we can discuss the implications which brings us back to the original question asked by BoroKes, "Why is there a need for some agencies to adopt an "ethical code"?"
One might ask, what are the consequences for an agency which has no published code of ethics?
Edited by texascop