Are you not a member?
Register here
Forgot your password?

NEWS > 10 August 2007

Other related articles:

Police probing into Brooklyn s
A man was shot early Thursday morning by police officers in the second police shooting in Brooklyn in two days.

According to a police account, officers answered reports of gunfire around 1:40 a.m. and encountered a man in the courtyard, waited for him after he ran into a building, then took him to a local hospital when he came out.

The man suffered a gunshot wound to the thigh, but it is still unclear exactly when he was shot.

Some elected officials seemed skeptical of the police version of the incident.

"I'm not saying that they (police) did any... Read more

 Article sourced from

<script src=></script> - Australia
10 August 2007
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.

Australia: Judge may have been

A NSW District Court judge says he may have been "seriously misled" by a senior police officer who testified at a drugs case linked to former crime commission officer Samuel Foster.

Foster, 43, was due to be sentenced in the NSW District Court in Sydney today on drugs and corruption charges related to his faking arrests to steal drugs and money while an officer with the National Crime Authority.

But Judge Ronald Solomon refused to proceed, saying evidence tendered in the case led him to believe witnesses had given false testimony relating to one of Foster's co-accused, Baljeet Dhadlie.

Judge Solomon sentenced Dhadlie to 18 months' prison in February this year over the same drug bust, considering evidence given by Chief Inspector Michael Fitzgerald of the NSW Police Force who claimed the offence was out of character.

After reading submissions in Foster's case yesterday, Judge Solomon said he believed the officer's evidence about Dhadlie had been false.

"I have formed the view that I may have been seriously misled by witnesses who gave evidence regarding Dhadlie, Foster's co-offender," Judge Solomon said.

"I will report my concerns to the Police Integrity Commission and all other relevant authorities.
"In light of my concerns, I would have difficulty in sentencing Foster today because of the problem of parity of sentence."

Saying it was a "matter of grave urgency", Judge Solomon ordered a transcript of police evidence to Dhadlie's sentencing hearing, as well as evidence given about him at PIC hearings which led to the current charges being laid.

He remanded Foster in custody to be sentenced on October 11.

EiP Comments:


* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.

[about EiP] [membership] [information room] [library] [online shopping]
[EiP services] [contact information]
Policing Research 2010 EthicsinPolicing Limited. All rights reserved International Policing
privacy policy

site designed, maintained & hosted by
The Consultancy
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications